<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Litetouch Folder Permissions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://deployment.xtremeconsulting.com/2009/10/26/litetouch-folder-permissions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://deployment.xtremeconsulting.com/2009/10/26/litetouch-folder-permissions/</link>
	<description>Join Xtreme Consulting&#039;s Microsoft Deployment Toolkit experts for discussion and solution sharing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:19:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: William BORIES</title>
		<link>http://deployment.xtremeconsulting.com/2009/10/26/litetouch-folder-permissions/comment-page-1/#comment-258</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[William BORIES]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 20:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tmintner.wordpress.com/?p=44#comment-258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great post ! I like the method Read/only folder &amp; Write only folder

I have just a question about the Authenticated Users group. Why do you choose to use this group instead of a dedicated service account ? 

And to be a psychopath, we could use a service account for Read/only folders and an another for Write/only folders. Why do you think about that ?

Patrick, nice idea for the script !]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post ! I like the method Read/only folder &amp; Write only folder</p>
<p>I have just a question about the Authenticated Users group. Why do you choose to use this group instead of a dedicated service account ? </p>
<p>And to be a psychopath, we could use a service account for Read/only folders and an another for Write/only folders. Why do you think about that ?</p>
<p>Patrick, nice idea for the script !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Firestone</title>
		<link>http://deployment.xtremeconsulting.com/2009/10/26/litetouch-folder-permissions/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick Firestone]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tmintner.wordpress.com/?p=44#comment-4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great post Keith. For those who choose to implement this through a script, it should be noted that &quot;cacls&quot; will ask for confirmation before applying the SDDL. For full automation in a script, you can add &quot;echo y&#124;&quot; before &quot;cacls&quot; in the command line.

cmd /Cecho y&#124;cacls c:\DeploymentShare\LogFiles /s...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Keith. For those who choose to implement this through a script, it should be noted that &#8220;cacls&#8221; will ask for confirmation before applying the SDDL. For full automation in a script, you can add &#8220;echo y|&#8221; before &#8220;cacls&#8221; in the command line.</p>
<p>cmd /Cecho y|cacls c:\DeploymentShare\LogFiles /s&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

